Search for: "Steve Graham"
Results 281 - 300
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Steven Graham actor in Boardwalk Empire tv series. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:37 pm
Sincerely, /s/ Stephen Graham email: steve@grahamdefense.com When I didn’t hear back right away, I sent a complaint to Google, and they responded: Hello, Thank you for your note. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:55 pm
" Graham cited Liu's Alito testimony as providing the "extraordinary circumstances" to support a filibuster. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:40 pm
Steve Graham is a criminal defense lawyer who represents many college students accused of crimes. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:22 pm
See Steve Vladeck’s excellent analysis of a prior version of the bill here. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
With a little bit of a stretch, one can call "Mercury Poisoning" by Graham Parker at leas a product liability song, but they sure weren't singing about Thimerosal. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 5:59 am
Steve Graham, a literacy expert at Vanderbilt. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Steve Schwarcz has written extensively about rating agencies; see his faculty bibliography page for various articles. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
; Steve Lewis, Advanced Drilling Technology Implementation Engineer, Seldovia Marine Services; Dr. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:24 pm
As Steve pointed out in one of his early posts, Sen. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm
After all, some unidentified federal judges agree with them that the [Graham bill’s] detention provisions are fine. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:40 pm
In response to this post Ben and I put up earlier regarding the Graham bill’s detention provision, Steve Vladeck has written a reply and given me permission to post it below. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
Lindsey Graham’s proposed “Terrorist Detention Review Reform Act,” which Wittes and Chesney support and Steve opposes. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:43 am
[A jointly-written post by Bobby Chesney and Benjamin Wittes] Does the substantive scope of detention authority conferred by the Graham bill (S. 3037) “dramatically expand existing law,” as Steve Vladeck alleges here? [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
boingboing, Intel + DRM: a crippled processor that you have to pay extra to unlock Fred Clark finds Jackie at the crossroads Juan Cole explains why in a certain foreign leader's mind Ahmadinejad resembles Cyrus the Great Greenwald savages Obama's tone-deafness to progressive concerns in Obama's view of liberal criticisms Grimmelmann, The Mufti of Constantinople Kos, Before you say the country is moving to the right… (look at all the evidence to the contrary) The ugly world of… [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:13 am
Indeed, part of why I flagged new Section 2256(f) was to note how unrelated it is to the “problems” that the Graham bill purportedly solves. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 11:35 pm
He defends the provision, which Steve Vladeck criticizes here. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:41 pm
Finally, Ben joins in my reading of the myriad ways in which the Graham bill would otherwise cut off judicial review of claims besides challenges to ongoing detention (a point curiously missing from summaries of the legislation), but is rather dismissive of my concerns, "finding myself nodding in agreement with each [result] straight across Steve’s incredulity. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:36 pm
Here they are in approximately the order in which they appear in Steve’s original post: 1) In his extensive criticisms of the Graham bill, Steve opens one of his sections with the following curious concession: “the Graham bill provides something vital that the AUMF did not: a specific definition of who can be detained. [read post]
