Search for: "Supreme Court of Alabama" Results 281 - 300 of 6,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Before the Supreme Court, Williams contends that exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required under Section 1983, and that the Alabama court’s decision to the contrary conflicts with decisions of the Supreme Court and other state high courts. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:09 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
” That conclusion was crucial because the court next referenced a 2013 Supreme Court case — University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Session 6: Role of the Judiciary Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (1986). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm by Ellena Erskine
Sheetz came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to apply the court’s Nolland/Dolan test and find the county’s fee a violation of the takings clause. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:58 am by Claudia Van Wyk
And our practice of filing friend-of-the-court briefs before the Supreme Court in critical capital cases will continue. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, held that Alabama’s voting maps discriminate against Black voters and violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
However, in only one of those cases was the verdict handed down by a non-unanimous jury.Finally, in its eagerness to ramp up capital punishment, Florida defied existing U.S. and Florida State Supreme Court precedent and enacted legislation authorizing the death penalty for child sex abuse offenders. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 2:37 pm by Geoff Schweller
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting that a qui tam whistleblower suit against the company be dismissed. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
He contends that Alabama should not be able to deprive him of the right to anoint Smith with oil and administer last rites.In his view, doing so infringes on his and Smith’s religious liberties.Here, Hood is building on the Supreme Court’s May 2022 decision upholding the right on religious advisors to pray audibly during executions and to touch the person being put to death. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:18 am by jonathanturley
Sullivan, the Supreme Court crafted the actual malice standard that required public officials to shoulder the higher burden of proving defamation. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:10 am by Eric Segall
The Supreme Court is not bound by and does not take precedent seriously. [read post]