Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 5:32 am
"I think that's a pretty big burden to impose on a district court judge. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 6:26 pm
Indeed, the DOJ's application in the Supreme Court comes close to walking back the admission of error. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:20 am
Today is Veterans Day (Observed), so courts are closed. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
And there's this from Leah Ward Sears, the former chief justice of the Georgia Supreme Court: “You have to know when to hold them, and know when to fold them. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 6:02 am
It's just a more formal way of referring to the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:30 pm
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 12:30 pm
" Using the awful 2007 Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
I had recently severely criticized a decision from the judge's court. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 5:00 am
But Alabama's all-Republican, wildly pro-business Supreme Court threw out his case. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Hurst v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
"The report from the Council of State Court Administrators' analysis opened with a quote from the Texas Supreme Court: "If the right to obtain justice freely is to be a meaningful guarantee, it must preclude the legislature from raising general welfare through charges assessed to those who would utilize our courts. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 5:54 am
Said Rushil Umaretiya, who grew up in an Indian immigrant family and will be a freshman at the University of North Carolina.Quoted in "After the Affirmative Action Ruling, Asian Americans Ask What Happens Next/No matter their views of race-conscious admissions, students were wary of the college application process — and some thought little would change" (NYT).Umaretiya's observation is based on what he saw colleges and applicants doing before… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
"Illness on Trial," is the title of a Sunday editorial in Raleigh's News & Observer. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court instructs that "a component" of a church's "autonomy is the selection of the individuals who play certain key roles. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:45 pm
Now, the Court is to decide whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is "testimonial" evidence.In layman's terms, the question is whether lab reports get admitted because, heck, of course they're always accurate so there's no need to cross-examine the folks who did the tests and wrote the reports? [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md) previously introduced the Shareholders United Act of 2019 (H.R. 936), a play on words invoking the Supreme Court's landmark opinion Citizens United, that would allow public company political donations only if a company has in place a procedure to assess the preferences of its shareholders. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
To many Court observers, we could probably stop there. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
He's right that she's been the best civil liberties champion on SCOTUS, so it's good to see that record illuminated and broadcast more widely beyond the narrow audience of people who read Supreme Court opinions.For Grits, who falls in the even narrower audience of people who read Texas Court of Criminal Appeals opinions, it's hard not to read the story and see… [read post]
