Search for: "Sykes v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
(Judge Sykes took this view in her recent decision for the Seventh Circuit in Korte v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:51 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Iowa Feb. 17, 2006) ("the plain language of §1507 states that judicial notice of the regulation is mandatory"). [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am
But Alito then weighs in on the "culture wars," criticizing the Court's handling of Fisher v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:56 am
The 2020 Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:53 pm
Sykes, 136 S.W.3d 635, 638 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
See, Sykes, Alan O. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
Consider United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am
"] From West v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
