Search for: "THOMAS v. MCDONALD " Results 281 - 300 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 6:29 am by David Post
I bring all this up now because over at SCOTUS, David Cohen asserts that McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
It was widely reported last week that Thomas Jefferson originally wrote "subjects" when he was drafting the Declaration of Independence, but then smudged it out with his hand and wrote "citizens" instead. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
In the wake of the Court’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
It was widely reported last week that Thomas Jefferson originally wrote "subjects" when he was drafting the Declaration of Independence, but then smudged it out with his hand and wrote "citizens" instead. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:01 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
On one level, explaining the result of McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Anna Christensen
At the Washington Post, Courtland Milloy discusses Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion filed Monday in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:09 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section (CJS) *, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust* MCDONALD ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Robert Cottrol is a professor at the George Washington University Law School who has written on the Second Amendment, including a 1991 Georgetown Law Journal article, “The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration,” which was cited by Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion in McDonald  Yesterday’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm by David S. Cohen
Yesterday I wrote about viewing the Supreme Court's landmark decision of McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh - Guest
I don’t have much that’s original or interesting to say about the historical and jurisprudential arguments made by the majority and the dissent in McDonald v. [read post]