Search for: "Tate v. Tate"
Results 281 - 300
of 592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
See, also, Elmira CSD v Newcomb, 266 AD2d 622, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 94 NY2d 899.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_05608.htm [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:05 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:05 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:05 am
People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:44 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 1:05 pm
In Tate v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Accruing vacation and sick leave credits during leave for ordered military leaveAndrews v State of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 02895, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAn employee of the State as the employer absent from his or her position while on “ordered military duty,” is placed on military leave* from his or her position in accordance with provisions in the State Military Law and the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A party to a stipulation of settlement cannot withdraw from the stipulation on the basis that it had "improvidently"agreed to itState of New York v Public Employment. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:38 am
Tammany Parish Government v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:25 am
Anderson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
Beam v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
Beam v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
Hausman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Tate, SMU Dedman School of Law, delivered at UC Santa Barbara on November 2, 2015, has gone up on YouTube.Via Slate's The Vault: a roundup (and more here) of the digital history sites that "dazzled" in 2015. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm
The Massachusetts high court held today, in Magazu v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:53 am
But the district court erred in dismissing the suit even before the expiration of the 21 day period (after the filing by the defendant of a responsive pleading or a motion to dismiss) during which a plaintiff may file an amended complaint without the court’s approval (Tate v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm
Romley v. [read post]
