Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Pride" Results 281 - 300 of 640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
" That language, with which Justice Kennedy tellingly opens his opinion for the Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:09 pm by Earl Drott
Drott is a dedicated Texas attorney who takes pride in helping people injured by the negligence of others in the pursuit of damages, and if you hire him, he will work tirelessly on your behalf. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
 The United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:24 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: 7 former McDonald’s employees in Northridge sue over age discrimination, June 22, 2015, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:31 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Then in 1952 the NAACP brought five cases to the Supreme Court challenging segregation and seeking to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm by Benjamin Gingrich
In 1992, the Pennsylvania Superior Court discussed this issue in detail in a case called Strutz v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 pm by Mark Bennett
Judges have little incentive other than pride to work hard once they get to the bench. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
  I try to keep up on the happenings of my favorite appellate court, and Justice Lippman in particular, ever since he grabbed me by the throat with his opinion in People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
The first episode, Maoist Takeover, was recorded at William & Mary Law School as part of their Scalia-Ginsburg Collegiality Speaker Series, and focuses on how to engage with people across profound disagreement, as well as on the Supreme Court's shadow-docket decisions in Yeshiva University v YU Pride Alliance. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:57 am by Steve Hall
In the modern era of capital punishment -- since the Supreme Court's decision in Gregg v. [read post]