Search for: "The People v. David C." Results 281 - 300 of 1,299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:48 am
Myanmar Order for Provisional Measures (I.C.J.), with introductory note by Alessandra Spadaro Case C-233/18 Zubair Haqbin v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
"On the evening of September 30, 2013, the defendant [Nina C. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Defendant Sanofi challenged plaintiffs’ statistical expert witness, David Madigan, a frequent testifier for the lawsuit industry. [read post]