Search for: "Tucker v. Tucker" Results 281 - 300 of 956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. 08a0329p.06 2008/08/29 Tucker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:54 am
In a criminal investigation, if law enforcement waits too long following the issuance of a search warrant to make an actual search or if they wait to long to act on certain information pertaining to a criminal act, the warrant or information could be deemed "stale. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Any remaining suit for damages falls under the Tucker Act and must be brought in the Court of Federal Claims.In Leek v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
At a hearing on a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the motion in accordance with C.P.L. 440.30(6) and as was held in People v Tucker, involving a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction based on new evidence pursuant to C.P.L 440.10(1)(g) and People v Tankleff. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:34 am
Court of Claims, testing whether the six-year statute of limitations on Tucker Act claims limits the Claims Court's reach (John R. [read post]