Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A B " Results 281 - 300 of 2,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am by Harbir Deol
Title III § 302(a)(v)(II)(cc) (2018)[xiii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(b)[xiv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1005[xv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(1)(B)(i)[xvi] 31 CFR § 800.901(b)[xvii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1004[xviii] Coalition Letter on the National Critical Capabilities and Defense Act by U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:08 am by Luciano Alvarado
Also undisputed was the fact that Celanese had sold Ace-K made using the patented process in the United States before the critical date. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Austria, Direitos Fundamentais & Justica no.29/2014, Oct. 2015).Oonagh B. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:03 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
We affirm all of the district court's decisions except for its dismissal of the United States of America in the FTCA action, because Jackson's amendment naming the United States related back to his original pleading, which was timely filed. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
(a) While "[p]unitive damages may properly be imposed to further a State's legitimate interests in punishing unlawful conduct and deterring its repetition," BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
[Note: this is the third post in a series on the history of the changes which were made by General Convention to the Constitution of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America beginning in 1889 and finalized in 1901. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]