Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. English"
Results 281 - 300
of 652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 1:43 pm
Neb., 262 U.S. 390 (1923); Bartels v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm
It would also require the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission to inform voters in all authorized plebiscites that if Puerto Rico retains its current status or is admitted as a State: (1) any official language requirements of the Federal Government shall apply to Puerto Rico to the same extent as throughout the United States; and (2) it is the Sense of Congress that the teaching of English be promoted in Puerto Rico in order for… [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
I just finished Julie Powell, Julie and Julia: My Year of Cooking Dangerously (thanks, Jocelyn) and have bookmarks somewhere in Bill Bryson, Made in America: An Informal History of the English Language in the United States, Charles J. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
It’s estimated that of the 10 million enslaved Africans brought to the Americas, 4.6 percent landed in the United States, and 90 percent were taken to Latin America and the Caribbean. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
To the contrary, repeating arms long predate the 1606 founding of the first English colony in America. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
It was said by the President of the United States, but at a private meeting, where I presume he, like many Presidents before him say "fuck" and other bad words all the time. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
The first case of the day will be Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
" (Samuel Dreher Matlack, Great American Lawyers: The Lives and Influence of and Lawyers Who Have Acquired Permanent National Reputation, and Have Developed the Jurisprudence of the United States: a History of the Legal Profession in America William Lewis ed., Vol. 3, p. 366. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
" (Samuel Dreher Matlack, Great American Lawyers: The Lives and Influence of and Lawyers Who Have Acquired Permanent National Reputation, and Have Developed the Jurisprudence of the United States: a History of the Legal Profession in America William Lewis ed., Vol. 3, p. 366. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
United States of America) (Mexico v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
This is the ruling of Mr Justice Arnold late last month in Innovia Films Ltd v Frito-Lay North America Inc [2012] EWHC 790 (Pat), in the Patents Court (England and Wales). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
