Search for: "United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  A bunch of plaintiffs from the United Kingdom sought to sue in the United States, despite their drugs being subject to an entirely different regulatory framework. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  Realizing that he was almost certain to be drafted into the military, he enlisted in the Army Air Corps in 1943, and served through the end of the 1945 baseball season. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm by Mona Solouki
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm by Christa Culver
EidDocket: 10-962Issue(s): Whether the Tokyo Convention requires deference to be given to the aircraft captain's decision, based on reports received from the cabin crew, to take action in response to passenger conduct that may jeopardize the safety of the aircraft or of persons or property therein or good order and discipline on board.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Professor Paul Dempsey et al.Amicus brief of… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(IP Whiteboard) Summary judgment Delta blow: Virgin Atlantic Airways v Delta Air Lines [2011] EWCA Civ 162; and Virgin Atlantic Airways v Premium Aircraft Interiors (IPKat) Half a million PCC damages cap likely from 14 June (PatLit) Pioneers, pirates and parvenus – IP v Innovation (IPKat) Rockwool fire ads held unlawful: EWHC (Ch) decision in trademark dispute Kingspan Group plc v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:17 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Labor RLA; preemption The Railway Labor Act does not completely preempt retaliatory-discharge claims under state law. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
At one point, the Deputy Minister tells the Agent that he will “keep him in the loop” about other bids and states that the last bidder might have “certain advantages. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Justice Ginsburg (picture, left) stated"What earthly sense would it make to prefer goods that are manufactured abroad over those manufactured in the United States? [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]