Search for: "Mona Solouki" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 5:02 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Connecticut lawyer Frances Codd Slusarz of Fox Rothschild on the firm's NY/CT Litigation Blog Not All Surprises Are Good Surprises, Especially When Buying Foreclosed Property - Fort Myers attorney Tyra Read of Henderson Franklin on the firm's blog, The Legal Scoop on Southwest Florida Real Estate Mobile App and Geolocation Data Roundup - Cincinnati lawyer Craig Hoffman of Baker Hostetler on the firm's Data Privacy Monitor Court Allows Widow to Use Dead Husband's Sperm -… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:20 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Mona Solouki On January 8, 2013 – less than a week after the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") entered into a consent order with Google,[1] under which Google is generally banned from seeking injunctions on its F/RAND[2] -encumbered standard essential patents ("SEPs")[3] – the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") banded together with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") (jointly referred here as "the Agencies") in issuing the Policy… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:36 am by Sheppard Mullin
Id. at 7 (emphasis in original; internal citations omitted) Authored by: Mona Solouki (415) 774-3210 [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:53 am
Authored by: Mona Solouki (415) 774-3210 [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
Authored by Mona Solouki(415) 774-3210msolouki@sheppardmullin.com1The FTAIA provides: [The Sherman Act] shall not apply to conduct involving trade or commerce (other than import trade or import commerce) with foreign nations unless- (1) such conduct has a direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect-(A) on trade or commerce which is not trade or commerce with foreign nations, or on import trade or import commerce with foreign nations; or (B) on export trade or export… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:11 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On August 18, 2009, the District Court for the Western District of Washington dismissed with leave to amend an MDL action against shippers for violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
On January 31, 2011, the District Court for Southern District of Ohio granted defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion, dismissing indirect purchaser class actions that challenged proposed reverse payment agreements as anticompetitive under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
On July 31, 2006, a unanimous Federal Trade Commission (“Commission” or “FTC”) ruled that Rambus Inc. [read post]