Search for: "United States v. Alvarez"
Results 281 - 300
of 660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
” Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
(Lozano v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:31 am
From Margaret Ryznar, writing for the Huffington Post: On December 11, 2013, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lozano v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
The employees contend that the Seventh Circuit’s decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v Barber Foods, Inc and, more importantly, with the High Court’s decision in IBP, Inc v Alvarez. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:22 pm
Alvarez (7th Cir. 2012) and Glik v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
Alvarez v Popect Hosp. ruled that when the moving party has demonstrated entitlement to summary judgment, the burden of proof shifts to the opposing party which must demonstrate by admissible evidence the existence of a factual issue requiring trial. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:07 pm
Holly Gardens Citizens in Action — federal Fair Housing Act’s application to disparate-impact discrimination claims No. 12-1038 — United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:28 am
United States, in which the Court split 4-4 . [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The children were granted United States citizenship in 2005. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:08 am
Reviewing the record as a whole and focusing on the Lozano factors, the Second Circuit agreed that JV was well settled in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
