Search for: "United States v. Arizona Canning Co"
Results 281 - 300
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:16 am
In my most recent post on the pending cell-phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Can Hobby Lobby avoid a substantial burden by dropping insurance? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am
Gallo & Co., Inc., v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In the states, we have had a viral contagion of state RFRA amendments that would make it possible for businesses to defend refusals to do business with homosexuals and/or same-sex couples (and in Arizona, with women, minorities, and the disabled, among others). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Courts in western states such as Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah, and Washington have preempted “confidential information” theft claims under their respective trade secret preemption statutes. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 5:02 pm
By Merrill BentAnderson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
In the opening brief in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Colorado (218), North Dakota (183), and Arizona (174) round out the top five. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
“We can change peoples lives. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
