Search for: "United States v. Brooks"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro… [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:15 am
Marama v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:40 pm
Cocaine Trafficking Case Law Review In State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Brooks, partner, and Samantha E. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
In addition, Americo’s letter to the AAA cited Brook v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:10 am
United States unanimously rebuffed efforts by two defendants to broaden an exception to mandatory firearm sentences under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
United States District Court, D. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:00 am
"Any search conducted pursuant to such warrant is the equivalent of a warrantless search," Judge Pratt wrote Monday in his 19-page order in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:57 am
The case is Berens v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Once a person becomes a Supreme Court justice, no concern should exist about being pleasing enough to senators and the president to get onto a higher court (and getting elevated to a higher court or retained on the existing court, when it comes to some state courts, should not be a concern with any judge on any court); this is the highest court the United States ever has had. [read post]
