Search for: "United States v. Newman"
Results 281 - 300
of 659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:29 pm
Autogenomics v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1435–36 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
November 24, 2008) (Feinberg, Newman, Cabranes, CJJ)This trio of long opinions, captioned In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 11:23 am
Weexplained that the Board’s interpretation of its regulationsin denying the proposed amendment was reasonableunder the particular circumstances in Proxyconn and wasconsistent with the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice’s (“PTO’s”) position expressed in the Board’s informativedecision in Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Newman, Eweida v United Kingdom, (Australian International Law Journal, Vol 20, 2013: 183-188).Hanna Lerner, Permissive Constitutions, Democracy, and Religious Freedom in India, Indonesia, Israel, and Turkey, (World Politics, Volume 65, Issue 4 (October 2013), pp. 609-655).Engy Abdelkader, Myanmar's Democracy Struggle: The Impact of Communal Violence Upon Rohingya Women and Youth, (Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 2014).From SmartCILP:Michael W. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:49 am
Supreme Court in Markman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:47 am
She went on to point out that the majority got it wrong on all counts (more or less).The IPKat has a lot of sympathy for Judge Newman's comments and expects that this case will be appealed or reheard en banc sometime soon. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
