Search for: "United States v. Sanders" Results 281 - 300 of 496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 1:12 pm by Emily Root
The Wine Group, Case No. 10-4202, the Court affirmed a preliminary injunction in favor of the distributors against the Wine Group (the third-largest wine manufacturer in the United States). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
” David Faigman, David Kaye, Michael Saks, Joseph Sanders, “How Good is Good Enough? [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
West, Member of Congress and Lieutenant Colonel, United States Army (Ret.), in Support of Petitioner Brief for Judicial Watch, Inc., and Allied Educational Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Louis D. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:50 am by Steve Delchin
  Still other parties supporting Whirlpool’s en banc petition include the Business Roundtable, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the National Association of Manufacturers, who are being represented by Pierre Bergeron, Phil Calabrese, and Emily Root of Squire Sanders. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:57 am by Pierre Bergeron
United States, the Sixth Circuit recently rejected an IRS appeal seeking a determination that a $59 million deduction taken by an insurance company was inappropriate. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by Kyle Wallor
”   In 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am by Schachtman
  Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]