Search for: "United States v. Treasury Employees"
Results 281 - 300
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Dep't of Treasury, State of Mich., Revenue Div. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am
By Rich McHugh As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
However, a U.S. hedge fund itself, as well as officers and employees of the fund’s investment manager or general partner, may still have a filing obligation under certain circumstances. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Sebelius (opinion downloads as a pdf), ruling the Affordable Health Care Act constitutional, or the 2013 cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
[iii] Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
The BOLO listings were either a lazy or targeted response (depending on who you talk to) to the significant uptick in tax exempt applications following the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Oral arguments began in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:46 am
But the Court’s affirmance in Lexmark was matched by a unanimous reversal in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
” Both sets of plaintiffs allege that, in their view, human life begins at the point where an egg and sperm unite, even before the embryo is implanted in the uterine wall, and that it is immoral to take steps to “terminate” such human life, even by preventing the embryo’s implantation. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Nevertheless, the United States Tax Court disallowed the deductions, ruled for the Commissioner, and Vetrick appealed. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
The official case name is United States of America v. [read post]
