Search for: "United States v. Weiss" Results 281 - 300 of 340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
  And Lyle Denniston of this blog, Jennie Ryan at JURIST, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal all provide coverage of Louisiana v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review a recent Second Circuit decision on this issue, Waggoner v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Feb. 27, 2007) (New Jersey statute); Weiss v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Weiss in Docket No. 1:23-cr-00061-MN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and Docket No. 2:23-CR-00599-MCS-1 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:42 pm by Grayson Clary
If these facts sound familiar to Lawfare readers, it’s likely because of their resemblance to United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
 In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two Families Got Fed Up with Their States’ Politics. [read post]