Search for: "Unknown Defendants A, B & C" Results 281 - 300 of 486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 7:55 am by Robert Chesney
§§ 1028A(a)(1), (b), (c)(4), and 2 2 years (mandatory consecutive). 30 Economic espionage. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  California’s solicitor general, Edward C. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
And algorithms are the key to unlocking this value of Big Data; hence they will be key in any IP Strategy. c) What is Intellectual Property Strategy? [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:58 am by Veronika Gaertner
Knöfel: “A new approach to EU Private International Law for seamen’s employment agreements: with special reference to the employer’s engaging place of business” The article reviews a judgment of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2011 (C-384/10), relating to the construction of Article 6(2)(b) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was Service Bérubé ltée c. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
Demarest agreed with Dorine (a) that the release does not cover transactions unrelated to Jersey Lynne Farms, (b) that the Caterina Realty operating agreement’s majority-rule provision does not insulate defendants from Dorine’s claims based on breach of fiduciary duty, and (c) that Caterina Realty may not advance legal defense costs of the individual defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 6:22 am by Legal Reader
:______________________________COMPLAINTPlaintiff, Richard C. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by K&L Gates
  The court acknowledged that it appeared that relevant discussions occurred in an unknown number of meetings “[b]etween May 1, 2007 and January 1, 2009. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm by Luke Rioux
§841(b)(1)(C) unless such use is a but-for cause of the death or injury. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
  Under section 5(3), the defence will be defeated if all three of the following conditions apply:- (a) It was not possible for the claimant to identify the poster of the statement, (b) The claimant gave the operator notice of their complaint in relation to the statement, and (c) The operator failed to respond to the notice in accordance with any provisions contained in regulations. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
The unknown female caller claimed to be the wife of Billy Johnson who had sent the e-mail to Joyce Kaufman. . . . [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:21 am by emagraken
Therefore, to epitomize what I have already written in the Cairney case, I say this: I will only go against a judgment of another Judge of this Court if: (a)        Subsequent decisions have affected the validity of the impugned judgment; (b)        it is demonstrated that some binding authority in case law, or some relevant statute was not considered; (c)        the… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
A or B or C ~A B or C ~BC The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 2423(b), one count of Engaging in Illicit Sexual Conduct with a Minor in Foreign Places in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]