Search for: "Webb v. Webb" Results 281 - 300 of 722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:08 am
" The very first example the cert petition offers of such extra-statutory expansion is United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
Va.The Culpeper paper reports here that the town of Culpeper keeps paying for the big case it settled before trial, including $20,000 in expert witness fees.Posts here and here examine the Fourth Circuit's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
” Duncan Webb, ‘Plagiarism: A Threat to Lawyers’ Integrity? [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” The defendant will rely on the recent “Havana Club” case, Pernod Ricard USA v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
Boskey (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 171, 183-84.)The only case in California that came close to the issues presented in this appeal was Webb v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The city doesn’t have to accommodate the religious objection under Title VII’s “reasonable accommodation” test, either, because (quoting Webb v. [read post]