Search for: "White v. Does 1-21"
Results 281 - 300
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
On June 21, 2010 the Ninth Circuit issued its en banc opinion in Murdoch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Henry, No. 06-1298 "Conviction and sentence for drug trafficking and contempt of court are affirmed over defendant's arguments that the district court erred by: 1) convicting and sentencing him in violation of the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against double jeopardy; 2) failing to conduct the sentencing enhancement colloquy mandated by 21 U.S.C. section 851(b); and 3) determining that two prior offenses were unrelated for Guidelines purposes. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:14 am
In the non-(f)(1) cases we observed, the prosecution sought detention 43% of the time for people of color, but only 21% of the time for white arrestees. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
White, 340 N.C. 264, 289, 457 S.E.2d 841, 855, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994, 133 L. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm
Hawkins v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
See White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
1. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 9:00 am
Trump, et al.; Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:04 am
—4/1/19 Fifth Circuit Adds New Wrinkle to Texas ACA Case—6/26/19 The ACA Cases Continue—7/1/19 On the Eve of Oral Argument in Texas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
The aftermath of Copenhagen: does international law have a role to play in a global response to climate change? [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
The “hear-by” date is 1 April 2019. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The lawsuit against the defendant should be dismissed, for two reasons. 1. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
If it does not, the compensation act does not disturb any existing remedy. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 00874-21 Mullins v telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00239-21 Treatz SHEFF LTD T/A v thestar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28382-20 Asaf v Midlothian Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2019) 2 Privacy (2019) 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2019) 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
Defended proceedings following a s.21 notice had resulted in a possession order. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
Defended proceedings following a s.21 notice had resulted in a possession order. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
Doe I (Dec. 1) Attorney Cameron Norris, CIC Services v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
