Search for: "Will Newman" Results 281 - 300 of 5,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Newman, was quoted in yesterday's New York Times responding to a question posted by a reader. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Newman (University of Saskatchewan College of Law) & Michelle Biddulph (University of Saskatchewan College of Law) have posted Comparativist-Structural Approaches to Interpretation of the Post-Obamacare Spending Power (Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (JICL), Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:38 pm
Newman explained, "It is the duty of the government to keep good records. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 8:36 pm by Patent Docs
The suspension, if imposed by the Judicial Council, is subject to review should Judge Newman agree to submit to neurological and psychiatric tests previously mandated by the Special Committee. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 12:30 pm
Judge Newman dissented in Sinorgchem. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
In an  age of greed, Newman was generous. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Judge Stoll authored the majority opinion and Judge Newman dissented, citing both procedural and substantive problems with the majority’s analysis. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 12:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Judge Pauline Newman dissented to today’s judgment, calling current eligibility jurisprudence a “morass” and saying she would have remanded the case for determination of validity under Section 112, or possibly Sections 102 and 103. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:15 am by IPWatchdog
Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part, stating that the “method that is described and claimed does not exist in nature” and “was designed by and is administered by humans,” so should be patent eligible. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Judge Stoll authored the majority opinion and Judge Newman dissented, citing both procedural and substantive problems with the majority’s analysis. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Judge Pauline Newman dissented, accusing the majority of departing “from the rule that patent claims are construed in accordance with the invention described in the specification. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Judge Pauline Newman dissented to today’s judgment, calling current eligibility jurisprudence a “morass” and saying she would have remanded the case for determination of validity under Section 112, or possibly Sections 102 and 103. [read post]