Search for: "Wood v. U.S." Results 281 - 300 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
To take the absurd and bring it down to simple terms, if Birch wood was illegal to possess and you had a piece of wood you thought was oak – can the government imprison you simply based on the fact you possessed wood? [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Dos años después, el TSEU negó efecto retroactivo a las determinaciones de U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
Those responses may give us a clear view of our future (Bexis had a Ouija board, after all) if, knock on wood, the Supreme Court rules in favor of preemption in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:41 am
  Wood, who clerked for Harry Blackmun, author of Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Natural experiment in greater Dallas area on whether fracking is good for local land values or not [Peter Van Doren, Cato] Inclusionary zoning drives up housing costs, allowing greater density would be better way to serve interests of poor [Scott Beyer] “The ‘Plan Bay Area’: Restricting Housing Development Isn’t Reform” [Jonathan Wood and Randal O’Toole, Forbes/Cato] “Poorly argued, destructive in intent”: Vatican’s eco-encyclical is… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Dennis Crouch
McKeesport Light Co, 159 U.S. 465 (1895) [16_S.Ct._75] Consol. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]