Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 17,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 10:01 pm
About 35 percent of younger consumers, aged 18-34, said they had declined such offers. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am
Martin, 35 Misc 3d 133(A), 951 N.Y.S.2d 88 (App Term 9th and 10th Dists 2012). [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
The district court also did not analyze the difference between making and using a claimed system under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Myriad Genetics, Inc, as proclaiming that “groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery does not by itself satisfy the §101 inquiry. [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
Does this mean you can’t own the copyright in something that you or an employee didn’t create? [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
AGCO does own another subsidiary, GSI, which has three facilities in the Central District of Illinois, but otherwise does not have its own locations in the District. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
In addition, the employer’s obligation to provide treatment would conclusively end if the employee does not receive medical treatment related to the claimed injury for a period of four or more years. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The application for the mark ‘France.com’ was filed in classes 35, 39 and 41, whilst the mark held by the French Republic is registered in classes 9 16, 35, 39 and 41. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 3:34 pm
” So, being above 20% does not function as a safe harbor unless the contractor takes concrete actions trying to meet the 35% requirement. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:37 pm
Example Applicant respectfully submits that the Smith patent does not qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:36 am
As one noted, “there is nothing in Article 50 itself one way or another; it does not say that you can retract or, once invoked, that you cannot retract. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:39 am
One year after Morrison there does seem to be at least some certainty within the Second Circuit on the interpretation and application of the Morrison transactional test. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:25 am
Hippocrate “Cheecho” Mertsaris: Does he have a weakness for judicial buttocks? [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:59 am
35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
First Internet Bank of Indiana, No. 17-1590 (“Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:05 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
., if they fired [Adler] in retaliation for his wife’s activities and for reasons of political patronage,” the McEvoy decision does not control and that the State has the burden of demonstrating that they would have removed the Adler from his position even if his wife had not been involved in litigation against the State.The lesson here is that where a policy-maker was dismissed because of his or her political affiliation, the federal courts will uphold the termination if there… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:05 pm
How does it work? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:33 pm
Amini does any housekeeping personally, but, again, as I said, I have – I have no idea. [read post]
