Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
” 1 David L. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
When an applicant is represented by a professional representative, then, according to decision J 5/80 [headnote 1], the request for re-establishment cannot be acceded to unless the representative himself can show that he has taken the due care required of an applicant by A 122(1). [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
However, the disclaimer of claim 1 does not exclude the polypeptides the sequence of which has at least 50% similarity with the sequence of 424 amino acids of figure 1 of document D1 or with any part of this sequence and which are capable of binding to IL-13 with low affinity. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
. and does not play an integral and vital part in the overall production or marketing of [products]”); Shepard v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
In fact, CCO had a special andquot;Cost Sharingandquot; relationship with the Oppenheimer Funds, whereby provided CCO included the Oppenheimer funds on its platform and allowed its wholesalerandrsquo;s access to its registered representatives (and customers), Oppenheimer would pay for sales presentations and seminars conducted in the bank, and in addition to 12b-1 fees, CCO would receive from Oppenheimer an additional percentage of the assets CCO customers held in the Oppenheimer funds. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm
In April of 2010, Hertz offered Dollar Thrifty $41 per share. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
Children Act 1989 (c.41) Part I, s 2(2). [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” SESAC does not operate under a consent decree. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:27 pm
CollegeSource, No. 2:10-cv-03542, slip op. at 41. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
" On its face, §8.01–581.20:1 does not apply to this patient fall case on 2 independent grounds. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
(Although it might seem paradoxical that one might have a First Amendment right to publish a photograph that one does not have a First Amendment right to take, this is a paradox familiar to anyone who has used a camera in a courtroom. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
Immunity therefore does not stand as a bar to Ontario recognizing the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
I was struck by two things: (1) The absence of any reference at all to trade agreements, the WTO or principles of trade law. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
This percentage does not take into account, however, the number of injuries or crashes by those driving under the .08 limit. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
Does that count as a win (because the law was ultimately upheld), or a tie (because the Court rejected the government’s primary argument for sustaining it)? [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:07 am
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(d), which you can find here, outlines the process. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:28 am
. : (1) For the purchase, sale or use of personal property or nonpersonal services which, in whole or in part, is necessary to the performance of any one or more contracts; or (2) Under which any portion of the contractor’s obligation under any one or more contracts is performed, undertaken or assumed. 41 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
We hold that a party's failure to disclose its experts pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness does not divest a court of the discretion to consider an affirmation or affidavit submitted by that party's experts in the context of a timely motion for summary judgment. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:18 pm
The 41-page decision is quite an interesting read. [read post]
