Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:46 pm
says of Faisal Shahzad: "He’s a citizen of the United States, so I say we uphold the laws and the Constitution on citizens . . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
Department of State Consulate abroad in order to come to the United States and be admitted as a Permanent Resident. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:32 am
United States, involving the scope of the federal “identity theft” statute. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:10 am
” TriVascular, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
However, animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (naming it Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
It needs to be taken into consideration that monetary compensation is the norm, not a rare exception, in the real world as far as the technology sector (from chipsets to cars) is concerned.In the United States, the fact that someone licensed a patent doesn't necessarily preclude the patent holder from being granted injunctive relief. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm
It's about nothing less than the ability of Apple and other patent holders to win permanent injunctions in the United States against direct competitors infringing some of their patents. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
This Kat was so reminded in revisiting the 2013 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Already LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
Yawn: amicus briefs in support of Google's API copyright petition to the Supreme Court have surfaced
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
Apple filing reveals Samsung recently reduced its 2.4% royalty demand for standard-essential patents
5 Apr 2013, 10:17 am
The Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
After Google's recent--and expected (this blog was first to report that it was coming)--petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari (i.e., for a review of the Federal Circuit's decision in Oracle's favor, see my refresher Q&A after the appellate decision), I have seen a couple of articles that described the state of affairs and quoted observers on what all of this meant. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am
United States, that the government "has charged itself with moral obligations of the highest responsibility and trust" in "dealing with the Indians [and] should therefore be judged by the most exacting fiduciary standards." [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:23 am
Oral argument for Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:14 pm
” Morgenstern v. [read post]
