Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2981 - 3000 of 3,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
The matter came before District Judge Purdy sitting in Westminster Magistrates Court in November 2011 and Judge Purdy made his ruling on Friday 13 January 2012. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day, BlockShopper.com settle… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:47 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Substitution of Judge Without Cause is Reaffirmed as the Law by Illinois Appellate Court Illinois Work Injury Lawsuit Results in Record Macon County Verdict – 3.09 Million Awarded in Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:55 am by John Culhane
Here’s dissenting Justice Alito from Snyder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am by SHG
Eastern District of North Carolina Judge Richard Myers in Nutt v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
If done in D.C., that would violate the District's prohibition on discrimination based on "personal appearance. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm by Adam Levitin
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
” The status of the morning after pill has been a key issue since the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Maras v Lesses ([2016] SADC 40) the District Court of South Australia awarded damages of Aus$75,000 to a member of the Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia against another member of the community in respect of a defamatory flyer, newsletter and email. [read post]