Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 2981 - 3000 of 15,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm by WIMS
Because kilns are co-located with raw material quarries and because there is significant variability in the pollutant content of those raw materials, a kiln may have low emissions simply because it happens to be blessed with good inputs, not because it is using a superior control technology. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
For that reason, and because the record adequately supports the EPA's conclusion that material negative health effects result from ambient air concentrations as low as the 100 ppb level, we cannot conclude the agency was arbitrary and capricious or violated the Act in adopting that level as the new one-hour NAAQS for NO2. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:52 pm by WIMS
Because kilns are co-located with raw material quarries and because there is significant variability in the pollutant content of those raw materials, a kiln may have low emissions simply because it happens to be blessed with good inputs, not because it is using a superior control technology. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:15 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Montana’s contribution limits continue to be contested in the court challenge of Lair v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:04 pm
The 6-3 decision in Romer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am by Brian Cordery
Brian Cordery and Claire Phipps-JonesThe UK Supreme Court today handed down its decision in Actavis v ICOS. [read post]