Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 3:32 am by Diane Tweedlie
"After this discussion the Board deliberated and subsequently informed the parties of its view that the subject-matter of claim 1 did not involve an inventive step.In the Facts and Submissions part of the written decision (see p.10) the comments from the petitioner with respect to D46 are summarized. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
P. 26(b)(5) (requiring that privilege logs ‘describe the nature of the documents, communications, or tangible things not produced or disclosed—and do so in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the claim [of privilege or other protection]’). [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
P. 23(b)(2) requirements for certification; and 4) remand was necessary for consideration of whether the proposed damages class met the Rule 23(b)(3) requirements. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Integrated scope proceeding would work; could lead a case to end b/c the P is claiming more than it has, but even if the case doesn’t end it’s an opportunity to articulate what’s protectable about the IP right. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by velvel
No real auditing.6 Tips not from an insider.6, 10, 22, 42, 43 Madoff being well connected.6 Not resolving open questions.7 Unprepared to take Madoff’s testimony.9 A&B’s nonrecordkeeping and reasons.9 Fake DTC records.9, 10 Ira Sorkin and A&B.9, 11 Only brief examination of Madoff in 1992.10 Price Waterhouse can’t audit A&B. 11 Judge Sprizzo11 3 to 7 billion in 2000.12 Not allowing performance audits.12 Ward apparently lied.12… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
P.15, which sets out the evidentiary standard that applies to a finding of misconduct. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
  (The brief at several places asserts that federal law requires the Greens or the employers "to provide specific contraceptives" to employees (p. 15; see also pp. 34, 41). [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"); id. 2.8(B) ("A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, … court staff, … and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity …. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Daniel Wasserstein
  However, this should not really matter much to associations. [read post]