Search for: "People v Word" Results 2981 - 3000 of 17,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
These words tell the story of racially biased policing in the county that begins before officers even go into the community. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
Sampling of musical recordings is a topic that excites a lot of people in the United States, where the bulk of the world's litigation on that subject appears to have taken place. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The competitor's antics may be unanticipated, even unattractive, yet lawful [Says this Kat: these words resonate with the observation of Jacob J, as he then was, in Hodgkinson & Corby Ltd v Wards Mobility Services Ltd (No.1) [1995] F.S.R. 169 that the law essentially lets a business do what it wants in a competitive environment, unless there is a specific rule to prevent it].The second factor is legal context. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent, an Egyptian national, had been a chairman of a company that operated a ferry which sank in Egypt and caused the death of over a thousand people. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The question for the ET was whether it is reasonably necessary in order to achieve the legitimate aims of the scheme to deny those benefits to people in the applicant’s position. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:22 am by Venkat Balasubramani
When one did, if he moused over the word, it would pull up an ad (an image from Affluent Ads’ or the advertisers’ server?) [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:49 am by Barry Eagar
  It might sound trite, by you'd be surprised how many people get it wrong.2. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:45 pm by Marcus Fulton
The long-running case of United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:04 pm
Words, especially words on a sign glimpsed by a passerby, cannot effectively capture that. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
I'm late in getting to it, but back in June The New York Court of Appeals held, in Reynolds v. [read post]