Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:20 pm
Then in the 2005 case of Illinois v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a court can award to a party who prevails in an action against the United States the “fees and other expenses…incurred by” that party if the position of the United States was not “substantially justified. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
-Alabama v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:27 pm
That is one of the central principles of the momentous Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:26 am
The parties agree the lake is a navigable water of the United States and so is subject to the CWA. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
And the Constitution of the United States affirmatively protects it.There it is, on pages 25-26 of the slip opinion: "Respondents have not shown that requiring doctors to intend dismemberment before delivery to an anatomical landmark will prohibit the vast majority of D&E abortions. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
[quoting West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
Like the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit assumed arguendo that such a right existed, recognizing that “[t]he Supreme Court of the United States has explicitly declined to decide whether there is a constitutional privacy interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:10 am
United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
In Loving v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia, of course, has run against that tradition repeatedly, telling many audiences, for example, to "get over" their criticism of the 2000 decision in Bush v. [read post]
