Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2024, 4:45 am
Section 2(2) Forfeiture Act 1982 The case of Philip Morris v James Morris, Kate Shmuel and Gregory White [2024] EWHC 2554 (Ch), summarized by Rosalind English of 1 Crown Office Row, concerned the forfeiture rule under section 2(2) of the Forfeiture Act 1982 as it applies to the estates of people who travel to Switzerland for assisted dying. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
The court ruled in 1993’s Herrera v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:05 am
(See Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:35 am
Betty Kunz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 3:00 am
Jessie Smith previously analyzed this aspect of Santa’s misconduct here, citing State v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 7:52 am
Betty Kunz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
” “Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses of the Southern District of New York recently addressed this issue in Bonde v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:18 am
Smith v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 12:30 pm
In its 2020 decision Tanzin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Before the Civil War, U.S. schools regularly excluded or offered inferior education to people of color. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
Because the judge must also be fair to the other party and consider the needs of other people’s court proceedings, the judge may have to limit the time you have or ask you questions that help you get to the legal issues involved in your case. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
“People are unobstructed. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
” Cariou v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
