Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 2981 - 3000 of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
Code § 1030(a)(5)(A), (c)(4)(B) and one count of possessing unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:03 am by John Jascob
The Second Circuit's decision, the petitioners asserted, "flouted" the Supreme Court's decisions in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”).Of First Amendment issues:A lawyer’s dissemination of compliments contained injudicial opinions was addressed in Dwyer v. [read post]
See California Business and Professions Code §§ 26001, 26051.5(a)(5)(A)-(E); 4 CCR § 15002(c)(19), 4 CCR § 15023(b), and 4 CCR § 17801 (collectively the “LPA Sections”). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Guest Bloggers
Assuming the taxpayer itemizes, this reduces the taxpayer’s federal taxable income by $500 as per Sections 170(c) and 67(b)(4). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Victoria VanBuren
by Alan Scott Rau Some of the readers of this blog may have missed the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Cape Flattery Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Is it unacceptable b/c of its outcomes? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Opponents of cell phone tower"  tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Opponents of cell phone tower"  tracking data relied on the 2012 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]