Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 2981 - 3000 of 5,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2017, 2:57 pm by Giles Peaker
Diaz v Karim [2017] EWHC 595 (QB) The schedule of special damages – never straightforward. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Restoration of leave credits used by employees electing to remain on the payroll while on Workers’ Compensation Leave pursuant to Civil Service Law §71Galuski v New York State Div. of Military & Nav. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
This notion is illustrated by what happened in Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
” The text doesn’t state that, but that’s the argument. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:17 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
However, no income tax deduction will be allowed for any payment made from the cash surrender value of a life insurance contract or the cash value of an annuity contract for coverage under a qualified long-term care insurance contract (Section 213(a) of the Code). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO rescinds patent claim and continuation rules (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (Inventive Step) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]