Search for: "State v. English"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:13 pm
," Oxford English Dictionary OnlineLink: Sekiya v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:41 am
" Here is the IPKat's translation of the German version of the ECJ's response in eis.de (Case C-91/09) -- this Kat has checked: Curia still does not offer an English translation and probably never will... [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:38 pm
As the Chief Justice acknowledged in his dissent in Ford, English common law did not permit the execution of the insane and every state prohibits it. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 10:00 am
Alex Sink v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
The duplication was made manifest, rather than avoided, by the fact each expert repeatedly stated that he agreed with passages in the other expert's reports. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 4:03 am
On 9 July, Clark was appointed Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:07 am
Each applicant then contested his proposed extradition in separate proceedings in the English courts, and had been unsuccessful. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
"Mandamus" is one of a number of the ancient writs that were available under English common law to compel or prohibit actions by a governmental entity. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:40 pm
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
The last time an English sovereign appeared in court was Charles I in 1649, with terminal consequences. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:52 am
As stated in the Krimstock Order, the Department must provide notice of the right to a retention hearing in two distinct ways: Notice of the right to a hearing will be provided at the time of seizure by attaching to the [Property Clerk’s] voucher already provided to the person from whom a vehicle is seized a notice, in English and Spanish, as set forth below. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
The IPKat's good friend Ventsi Stoilov has produced an entire English translation (here). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
To illustrate the common law approach, Koopman points to Bukton v. [read post]
