Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:08 pm
The February 12, 2019 order in the case by Central District of California Judge Stephen V. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:58 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral argument in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURING CORP. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 14th, 2019) involves a personal-injury lawsuit arising from injuries that the plaintiff sustained while employed as a truck driver. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
How the high court decides these cases is likely to be instructive to everyone involved in the upcoming round of redistricting in the fifty states. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
In a partially published opinion filed January 30, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition challenging the City of Berkeley’s approval of use permits for three single-family homes on three contiguous hillside parcels. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
The post Davis v Bandemer Held Courts Can Decide Partisan Gerrymandering Claims appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:07 am
Nearly six months later, he returned to ask the very same question to the state’s counsel in Benisek v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
The court dodged this issue in Gill v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
This standard is familiar to first-year law students and is undoubtedly judicially manageable. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
In a memorandum opinion, the Houston court first stated judicial review of an arbitrator’s decision is “extraordinarily narrow. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Three-judge district courts granted relief in both cases. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
Lower courts have taken this First Amendment theory and developed creative legal fictions. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:06 am
But that, the court says, violates the Second Amendment in this case: In Binderup v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Military Departments on the state of the services. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
