Search for: "State v. Mars" Results 2981 - 3000 of 4,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:55 pm by Kelly Buchanan
If you've ever seen this day marked on your desktop calendars and wondered what it was, think La Niña (née La Santa Clara), La Pinta, and La Santa María. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:26 am by Jon L. Gelman
The dismissal by a Judge of Compensation of petitioner's claim after trial for failure of petitioner to meet their burden; or v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:50 pm by Carolyn Elefant
  In such attorney MARS provider arrangements, attorney often do little or no legal work on behalf of consumers, with non-attorneys handling most functions including communications with the lender...Many state statutes offers exemptions, but attorneys offering MARS often have flouted state bar rules, such as prohibitions on fee splitting, referral fees... [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
   Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 5:43 am by SHG
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" [of the result]I first scoured the majority opinion, written by Ginsburg, looking for how the court would distinguish the principle in this case from the principle in [United States v. [read post]