Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 13,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm
., Ltd v Digi International Inc. [2020] SGIPOS 1.The Parties Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (the "Opponent") is a Japanese company dealing inter alia, in electronic price-computing scales named 'DIGI'. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
It can be inferred from the decision that the CJEU agrees, stating as it does that application will require an "exceptional case" [par. 75]. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am
DWD could be stating here that being quarantined is good cause. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
In a brief opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:51 am
The opinion does not state if, or when, the relevant deeds were filed with the register of deeds. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
There was a piece on The Register. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 11:53 am
The first was of my making: I failed to grab from State Corporation Commission website the name of Shaw’s registered agent. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
The following shall not be registered: [...] [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
However, the CJEU disagreed with the GC's conclusion that the absence of such a statement would preclude any association between those shops and the goods of the mark applied for.First, the CJEU emphasised that the line of authority derived from Praktiker concerned only applications for registration as TMs and did not concern protection of trade marks registered at the time of the Praktiker judgment (EUIPO v Cactus, C-501/15 P). [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm
In a brief opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:57 am
Shadi.com v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
Perhaps it means 30M+ registered users who use the service in a month? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
Did you know that in 1935 applicant built the world’s largest grand piano, for the Silver Jubilee of King George V and Queen Mary? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
