Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 14,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Center had challenged certain provisions in a bill establishing the budgets for the State Legislature and the State's Judiciary for the 2016-2017 fiscal year. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
The case Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Center had challenged certain provisions in a bill establishing the budgets for the State Legislature and the State's Judiciary for the 2016-2017 fiscal year. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
NOTE: The petition discussed in the post below — National Rifle Association, et al, v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 5:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 2:18 pm
The new law expanded the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Today’s argument in Delia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
The Court will distance itself from U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
(c) The communication furthermore announced that, should the applicant ask for a decision on the state of the file without filing further requests, amendments or comments, the application would then be refused "based on the above arguments taken in combination with the arguments provided in the summons" (see communication B, point 3).V. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Lynch (Religious Freedom; Controlled Substances)Navajo Nation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Regulation 2(1) states that:“The articles of association of a RTM company shall take the form, and include the provisions, set out in the Schedule to these Regulations. [read post]
