Search for: "State v. Weekly"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 4:40 am
Wang v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
In Carson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Moran v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
Moran v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm
Using the state’s Child Support Enforcement Services can have unintended results. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:16 pm
Under Arizona v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Learning Outcomes will be monitored through student participation in the weekly discussion of problems that build on readings. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
District Court Judge Vacates DOL’s Modified Definition of “Companionship Services” Continue Reading…
16 Jan 2015, 9:22 am
Just over three weeks after vacating a regulation barring third party employers from claiming the companionship exemption for minimum wage and overtime, in a January 14, 2015 decision in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Myrick v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Bright and early this Monday morning comes the 23rd weekly Never Too Late round-up of the previous week's Katpost features. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:29 am
Hewitt, No. 21-984 In Hewitt v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> El Comite el Bienestar de Earlimart v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Hardwick (1986), which rejected a privacy challenge to the state's power to make consensual "homosexual sodomy" a felony with a mandatory one year sentence. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Weekly D1553bPublic Employee: FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SUE STATE OVER CHANGES IN RETIREMENT BENEFITS, Williams v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
(10) Certain service-connected disability payments Any amount payable to an individual as a service-connected (within the meaning of section 101 (16) of title 38, United States Code) disability benefit under— (A) subchapter II, III, IV, V,,[1] or VI of chapter 11 of such title 38, or (B) chapter 13, 21, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, or 39 of such title 38 [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:42 pm
” The lawsuit, Blesch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
It’s a weekly showcase of the best that the legal blogging community has to offer. [read post]
