Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 2981 - 3000 of 11,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
That is a bar the majority of field has not hit and is not on track to do so. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
When cases are brought in federal court concerning state law, the federal court is often required to look to case law from that state to determine how a state court would rule on the law at issue. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:07 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
” It argues that the California law is a violation of the First Amendment, in that it bars states from passing laws to retaliate against an individual for his or her political associations or speech. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
But putting aside various special regulations that states may enact, that’s not what contract law traditionally says. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:08 am by Dan Bressler
” “Instead of approving the petition, the state supreme court tightened the confidentiality rule, saying in its order, ‘We decline to amend the rule as proposed by the Bar. [read post]
And while states like California continue to adopt “the wise restraints that make men and women free,” it is terribly unfortunate that nearby states provide havens for those who would circumvent California gun regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The authors found that LSAT and GPA are only weakly predictive of first-time bar passage rates, and that performance in the first year of law school had far greater predictive value. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 6:03 am by Legal Profession Prof
"Extraordinary good character" did not save an attorney from disbarment per the report and recommendation of the California State Bar Court Hearing Department Respondent demonstrated extraordinary good character attested to in letters from eight people, representing a wide range of... [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:13 am by Staci Zaretsky
" [New York Times] * Where has Leah Wilson, the California bar's executive director, been amid all of the madness concerning the state's unhead of leak of its bar exam essay topics? [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Brian Morris ruled the agency did not give proper public notice before it stopped requiring social-welfare groups, labor unions, and business associations to identify donors contributing more than $5,000. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:46 pm by Cindy Cohn
We should encourage a race to the top by states in passing privacy laws, and the federal government should raise the bar, not lower it. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:10 pm
The Supreme Court of California today issued the following statement about the disclosure related to the July California Bar examination:Over the weekend, State Bar officials advised the court of the inappropriate disclosure, to certain law school deans, of the general subjects to be tested on the essay and performance test portions of the July 2019 California Bar Examination, and of the State… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:57 am by Brett Holubeck
Newton The court ruled that the Outer Shelf is not subject to overlapping state and federal jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:01 am by Jami Fosgate
” To highlight the extent of the problem, in 2014 the State Bar amended the oath new attorneys are required to take to add a civility requirement! [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
It has been over forty years since the Supreme Court of California held that psychotherapists have an affirmative duty to reveal confidences in order to protect potential vic [read post]