Search for: "U.S. v. Fields" Results 2981 - 3000 of 6,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
T his case, Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
Notably, however, both the Second Circuit in Rothstein v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am by Florian Mueller
Google is also working on some interesting technology in that area but Apple appears best positioned to turn self-driving, electric cars into great and lucrative products, and to leverage unbelievable synergies--more than anyone would imagine now--with its other products.Self-driving cars will also get Apple involved with the wider field of robotics. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by David Strifling
”[9]  And yet, it’s not clear whether that is as true today as it once was. [1] 146 U.S. 387 (1892). [2] 156 Wis. 261, 145 N.W. 816, 820 (1914). [3] 2011 WI 54, ¶¶ 3-5, 335 Wis. 2d 47, 799 N.W.2d 73. [4] Muench v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am by Freddie Whittle
Moreover, back in 2003, Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor set the timer after the case of Grutter v Bollinger 539 U.S. 306 (2003), suggesting the affirmative action should not be a necessary tool within 25 years. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  But, as applied to health laws in particular, courts invoke the presumption not solely on federalism concerns, but also on an assumed “history” or “tradition” of state primacy in the health and safety regulation fields. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
  As we store away the wrapping paper and pull out the New Years’ hat and horns, we thought it would be a good time to review the significant agricultural law developments of 2015. [read post]