Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 2981 - 3000 of 4,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
” The Court notably took a similar approach last month in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am by NCC Staff
Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, 15, died in 2010 as he stood on Mexican soil by a border officer who fired his gun while on United States soil in Texas. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Court is badly fractured, as Justice Barrett writes her first separate writing. ] Around 10:45 PM ET on Friday evening, the Supreme Court decided South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben also contrasted Donald Trump’s latest proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States with Mai El-Sadany’s piece on being an American Muslim these days. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:01 am by Susan Brenner
” As Wikipedia also notes, the Federal Rules of Evidence “is a code of evidence law governing the admission of facts by which parties in the United States federal court system may prove their cases, both civil and criminal. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
EmulexAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Exception #1: Law Enforcement It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state… [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm by M@jux-@dmin
EXCEPTION #1: LAW ENFORCEMENT It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
” For its part, the United States expressed a more restrained sense of optimism, at least officially. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm by Rosalind English
As for (both ante- and post-) nuptial agreements, Wilson J commented in S v S (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum) [1997] 1 WLR 1200, Where other jurisdictions, both in the United States and in the European Community, have been persuaded that there are cases where justice can only be served by confining parties to their rights under prenuptial agreements, we should be cautious about too categorically asserting the contrary. [read post]
Two years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Pliva v. [read post]