Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 4,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Hashim Mooppan, Counselor to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Or, consider the 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 8:04 am
Mich.) in Al Qassimi Academy v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:08 am
He was 89.Judge Pollak, who served on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was widely regarded as one of the leading members of the judiciary in the country. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
United States and the Birth of Federal Civil Rights Enforcement,” an essay version of Marquette Law School’s 2014 E. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Paul). [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
Two years ago, in Honeycutt v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:08 am
United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm
Paul (1969) held that this term includes "recreational areas" and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
Mr Palmer argues comments made by Mr McGowan in 2020, which included calling him an “enemy” of the state, damaged his reputation. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
Paul Dowling was convicted of violating 18 U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
WEBRE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF TEXAS UNITED CORPORATION AND UNITED SALT CORPORATION, No. 12-0045 : This petition raises several questions about shareholder suits in closely held corporations. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
Christos V. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
It requires that the secretary submit a yearly report to Congress detailing: DHS’s responsibilities for “coordinating the election infrastructure critical infrastructure subsector”; One-year and five-year plans for improving the security of election infrastructure that include “lessons learned, best practices, and obstacles from the previous year”; Election infrastructure work with each individual “State, unit of local government, and tribal and… [read post]
