Search for: "York v. Texas"
Results 2981 - 3000
of 3,947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 11:59 am
They’re not missing an “a” and a “v” here or there? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Florida, New York, Texas). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
The varying approaches to this issue by different states can be seen in the New York State Court of Appeals in Kaur v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(IPKat) US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D New York: Merchandising of Shepard Fairey ‘Obama Hope’ image not fair use; factual issues remain on substantial similarity: Shepard Fairey et al v Associated Press (Copyrights & Campaigns) Do-over on the writing requirement: Vergara Hermosilla v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Niki Black hosted Blawg Review, in celebration of International Women's Day, National Women's History Month, and the 30th anniversary of the National Women's History Project, on Sui Generis, her New York law blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
Niki Black hosted Blawg Review, in celebration of International Women's Day, National Women's History Month, and the 30th anniversary of the National Women's History Project, on Sui Generis, her New York law blog. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Ark. 2010); Kohl v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:18 pm
Centocor and New York University v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
Texas nor Roemer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm
Supreme Court Sides with Vaccine Manufacturers in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
But this was New York, not say Texas or Ohio. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
John Ward of ED Texas gets reversed. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
Irby and City of New York v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:35 am
In tech-but-not-law news: The New York Times now has e-book-only bestseller lists. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
Wenner v. [read post]
