Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2008, 6:54 am
In Siniard v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Employer advised the Office of the State Comptroller of Plaintiff's fraudulent time submissions. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Employer advised the Office of the State Comptroller of Plaintiff's fraudulent time submissions. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:22 am
For example, the Bush v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
Section 282 also states that a party wishing to invalidate a patent bears the burden of rebutting this presumption. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm
Section 282 also states that a party wishing to invalidate a patent bears the burden of rebutting this presumption. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
As the trial judge committed a legal error that had a material bearing on the acquittal, the verdict is necessarily invalid. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:36 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
In a June 2013 opinion in another Guantanamo case, Shafiq v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm
The Court then discussed State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 2:38 pm
January 30, 2021 State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
Before a state or municipal gun law can be challenged, the Supreme Court will have to decide that the right to keep and bear arms is also protected by the 14th Amendment, which limits state powers. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
By a vote of 6-3, the court dismissed as moot a Second Amendment challenge to New York City’s now-repealed limits on transporting personal firearms, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:33 am
Schoenwetter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
The Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:37 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:29 am
(All of the cases bear the same title, Perry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) put an end to all suspense and resistance, stating it was perfectly legal for a contract to stipulate that the buyer bears the re-sale right royalty in the context of a sale between professionals, thereby siding with the CJEU (here). [read post]
