Search for: "Commitment of M B"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 3,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm
I’m willing to consider the idea. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
§ 4248, regarding a federal civil commitment program for certain sex offenders. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
” (I’m going to ignore fit here.)A Justice could vote to uphold a government law (i.e. decide it is not unconstitutional) based on one rationale, but reject other possible rationales. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Es un verdadero gusto para mí presentarles al profesor Gustavo Schötz, tercer blogger invitado de DIPr Argentina. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:17 am
[B]ased on the way the examiners understood their assignments, the searching was not limited to the items listed in Attachment B to the first search warrant. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
Three things need to be shown:(1) That there is a domestic relationship between the parties: s.11, s.20(1)(a);(2) That the respondent has committed an act of domestic violence against the aggrieved: s.20(1)(a); and(3) The respondent is likely to commit an act of domestic violence again or if the act of domestic violence was a threat – is likely to carry out the threat: s.20(1)(b).Domestic relationships are:(a) A spousal relationship. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:09 am
- Paragraph (2)(B) contains no time limit on when the particular conviction occurred. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:52 am
Robert M. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:26 am
The IPKat has learned, via the UK Intellectual Property Office, of Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Paine v Standard Verlags GmbH, Axel Springer AG, Süddeutsche Zeitung GmbH, Spiegel-Verlag Rudolf Augstein GmbH & Co KG and Verlag M. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:54 am
`[M]ere use of a website is not sufficient to trigger’ a mass-marketing enhancement. . . . [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:11 am
" I'm not being facetious. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:25 pm
Note that I’m not speaking here about the proper policy with regard to guns and those who have once been mentally committed (a difficult question), or even the Second Amendment issue — just about the text of the federal statute. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:49 am
(And no, I’m not saying that conservatives and libertarians are oppressed.) [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm
What I do know is that I'm sympathetic to Larry's attempt to resolve the antinomy; I'm far less sure about whether a conscious cognitive process by which one cabins areas of under-determinacy actually works. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:29 pm
Wachter, who is also Editor of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) Rounds on the web interviewed Gerald B. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:32 am
B. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:19 am
I thought it might be interesting to look up exactly how many doctors commit crimes or lesser offenses in this country, and sure enough we do keep track of that sort of thing. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
(I only suggested that above; I'm saying it now.) [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
However, fairly obviously there are two criteria:• Domestic• Violence[4] In general terms, domestic violence occurs in a relationship of a domestic nature, typically husband and wife or de facto partners, whereas family violence occurs in a broader family relationship, eg parent to child.[5] The mistake that is often made is to fail to recognise abuse that is not physical, which can clearly be identified as domestic violence.[6] A useful definition, as good as any out there, and one we… [read post]
