Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 11:17 pm
Affirmed.NFP civil opinions today (1): Lafayette Accounts Svc., Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:40 am
It does not appear that the courts will hear any pleas that may result in a defendant being sentenced to immediate incarceration during phase 2. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
The Court was unpersuaded by Defendants’ position that placing the sugar content on the drink’s label made consumer confusion relating to the health of VitaminWater unreasonable: “a nutritional panel, though relevant, does not as a matter of law extinguish the possibility that reasonable consumers could be mislead. . . . [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:40 am
It does not appear that the courts will hear any pleas that may result in a defendant being sentenced to immediate incarceration during phase 2. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
1. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:36 pm
(ii) Within 30 days of receiving a Defendant’s initial list of search terms pursuant to Paragraph 2(c)(i) above, Plaintiff may make good faith modifications to Defendants list by deleting proposed terms of their choice and/or by adding additional search terms they would like, so long as the list does not exceed 20 terms. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:29 pm
By seeking to enjoin Sections 1-6 of SB 1070 from taking effect, Plaintiff seeks to overturn 20 years of precedent. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 2:49 pm
Because that is the same court that Flea was live-blogging his own medical malpractice case from earlier this year.Addendum:7/17 -- See Battle Lines Are Drawn in Day 1 (Wizard of Odds, after first day of trial).7/18 -- The Return of Weis' Hired Hand (plaintiff's expert testifies it was malpractice to give Weis the blood thinner Heparin post-operatively while he was hemorrhaging) (Wizard of Odds)7/19 -- The Big Guy Takes The Stand (Wizard of Odds)7/19 -- Weis Takes Stand in… [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:49 am
In this case, it does. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
It certainly makes it more difficult for plaintiffs to survive a motion to dismiss in a Section 1 case. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
In addition to bracing for its impact, employers may also want to reassess their litigation strategies in whistleblower cases. [1] See 8/21/20 Senate Floor Analyses, http://www.leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billAnalysisClient.xhtml? [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Br. of Amicus United States 19-20. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:04 am
LogistiCare Solutions LLC, No. 20-CV-852, 2020 U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:27 am
On Monday, April 20, SCOTUS granted a petition for certiorari in a case that may finally provide clarity to a question that has troubled defense attorneys and trade secrets practitioners alike for many years: what does it mean to “exceed authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:10 am
He had been on the job for over 20 years. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
That is, we defend drug (and medical device) companies, not food companies. [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:11 pm
Some thoughts: [1.] [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:00 am
On the civil side, hospitals were nearly 20% of the defendants in health care fraud cases, other medical facilities accounted for 18%, and individual beneficiaries less than 1%. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
D does not have to do a darn thing. [read post]
